Tonkin v UK Insurance (No. 2)
[2006]
EWHC 1185 (TCC) and [2006] Con LR 107
Nature of case
The defendants succeeded in getting indemnity costs where the
claimants had been awarded a sum less than the defendants’ payment
into court and where the claimants had twice refused sensible
offers of ADR and otherwise behaved unreasonably. The court made a
number of findings on criteria for obtaining indemnity costs.
Pursuit of a weak claim, rather than a hopeless one, would not be
enough, nor would refusal of ADR automatically be so. Here,
however, the claimants’ conduct fulfilled the requirements for
indemnity costs, being unreasonable and, at times,
reprehensible.
Link to Judgment
Counsel:
Rosemary Jackson QC
Jonathan Selby
<< Back to Reported Cases