Interserve Industrial Services Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK
Ltd
[2006]
All ER (D) 49 TCC
Nature of case
Where a series of adjudications between claimant
sub-contractor and defendant contractor were initiated, the
defendant tried to resist enforcement of the decision of the second
adjudication by maintaining that it could be set off against the
third award, which had been issued during the enforcement
proceedings. The TCC rejected this argument: under ss.108(3) and
111of the HGCR Act and the CIC Model Adjudication Procedure
adopted, defendant was under an obligation to pay the amount of the
second award and summary judgment was entered.
Link to Judgment
Counsel:
<< Back to Reported Cases