Reported Cases

AMEC Civil Engineering Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport  [2005]  CILL 2228 and [2005] BLR 227 CA

Nature of case:

This is the report of the CA’s dismissal of the contractor’s appeal in the ‘Thelwall Viaduct’ case.  The contractor had argued that there was no dispute or difference capable of reference to arbitration.  However, the CA’s view was that ICE (5th Edition) Clause 66 should not be construed legalistically so as to preclude timely commencement of arbitration proceedings.  The CA held the judge’s analysis to have been correct, given the claimant’s resistance to the defective work allegations.  Note that Jackson J’s ‘seven propositions’ on the dispute/no dispute issue appear to have been upheld by the CA.  Note also that the decision expressly related adjudication cases to arbitration.

See other reports:

[2005] 1 WLR 2339 CA
[2005] Con LJ Vol.21 No.8 p.640 CA
[2005] 101 Con LR 26 CA
[2005] CILL 2189 TCC

Counsel:

Vivian Ramsey QC
Simon Hughes
John Marrin QC
Sarah Hannaford


Back to Reported Cases

All images on this web site are illustrative only and their use is not intended to imply anything other than artistic license.  |  Legal Notice  |  Developed by 3internet

Keating Chambers Service Company Ltd. 15 Essex Street, London, WC2R 3AA. Tel: +44 20 7544 2600 www.keatingchambers.com. Company No. 05161157. Registered in England and Wales.