AMEC Civil Engineering Ltd v Secretary of State for
Transport
[2005]
CILL 2189 TCC
Nature of case
This decision has attracted considerable interest because of the
“seven propositions” by which the dispute/no dispute issue is to be
decided for the purposes of ICE 5th Clause 66. The
“Thelwall Viaduct” case, as it is known, also concerns the scope of
the engineer’s decision-making jurisdiction. Permission was
granted to appeal to the Court of Appeal (see below). Note
that the decision expressly relates adjudication cases to
arbitration.
See other reports:
[2005] 1 WLR 2339 CA
[2005] Con LJ Vol.21 No.8 p.640 CA
[2005] 101 Con LR 26 CA
[2005] CILL 2228 and [2005] BLR 227
CA
Counsel:
<< Back to Reported Cases